Art as a Semiotic Fact: Semiotics from Language to Art

The linguists and later scientists Semiotics hesitated a long time to analyze the Private Messages arts , though they have succeeded in their application to literary texts written because glottology give her tools serious analysis of literary language and study , as well as the written text something relatively fixed , but it's different every difference for the visual arts because a large number of formats aesthetic ( color and shade and dimensions ) in the Fine Arts , and the lighting and angles and performance in the movie theater - they operate at the same time making the analysis of full of excitement , and very tough at the same time
      So there were a lot of currents and schools that tried hard to demonstrate the possibility of analyzing the artwork and letters analysis Semiotics , of these schools : school formal Russian School, Bakhtin , and the Prague School - can be viewed as an extension or re-evaluation of the formal Russian - In what between 1928 - 1948 Czechoslovakia appeared in a large group of linguists and theorists in the theater , literature and music , known as the Prague School . This school is an impressive sight Semiotics - the first structural organization to study art . ( Semiotics of art - the study of art as a system of signs ) that view , which is already established by the article " committees " Jan Mukarovsk " art as a fact Semiotics ." Although most of its members were linguists , but they were looking to Semiotics of art as the cornerstone for their project . And that the work developed not only in the history and literary form , but also in theater, cinema , music, painting , as well as the problems and the general theory of aesthetic
     Description Jean Mukarovsk - Czech prominent literary theorist - as a sign of independent art , in other words, as a newly self- goal need not suggesting topics or real situations . At the same time wants Jan Mukarovsk exceeded aesthetic formalism and that by insisting that art is autonomous and frank . He adds , stressing also that the substantive theme itself may result in several functions of aesthetic functionality to the social and cognitive .
     Benefited Mukarvsk of Ferdinand de Saussure, he prove that art " artwork " The fact Semiotics , through the transformation of the division " Saussure ," the sign language to the ( concept Picture / audio ) or ( D / meaning ) , to look at the artwork as a ( sign ) consists The two faces of " artwork " - something of a man-made or produced by his proficiency - which correspond to " signifier " when Saussure , and " Thread aesthetic " It corresponds to " meaning " when Saussure . And what the consequences of this understanding of the technical mark and components in art .
    Are these theorists succeeded in analyzing the artwork and letters Semiotics analysis ? And whether they can prove that Semiotics perspective is the only one who would allow theorists to recognize the independent existence of the structure of technical and fundamental dynamics , and understand the evolution of this structure as a potential movement , but in a dialectical relationship with the development of a permanent other areas of culture ? That's what I tried to point out through this research .