This paper investigates the application of the theory of rhetorical relations in structuring two English Romantic sonnets: Coleridge’s: “To the River Otter”, and Keats’s “To Ailsa Rock” both dealing with elements of nature – by using Crombie’s model (1985) in describing their logical and imaginative thematic progression. The paper also investigates the quantitative relevance of the densities of rhetorical relations and the sonnets’ thematic structure. Data analysis has shown that rhetorical relations are not mutually exclusive, but can be superimposed upon each other; thus, contributing to the sonnets’ high semantic load and coherence. Also, the ordering of rhetorical relations’ members is flexible in that one member can precede or come after the other, allowing either member-anticipation or member-retrospection. Moreover, the very high densities of the rhetorical relations of setting/conduct and matching in the data is indicative of their centrality to the coherence of Romantic poetic diction. In contrast, the absence of the rhetorical relations of truth-validity and alternation in the data is suggestive of their being not particularly coterminous with such a poetic diction.
Abbas Ghubin Al-Zubaidy, B. (2023). Application of Rhetorical Relations in the Analysis of Two English Romantic Sonnets. Annals of the Faculty of Arts, Ain Shams University, 51(3), 239-250. doi: 10.21608/aafu.2023.287480
MLA
Baidaa Abbas Ghubin Al-Zubaidy. "Application of Rhetorical Relations in the Analysis of Two English Romantic Sonnets". Annals of the Faculty of Arts, Ain Shams University, 51, 3, 2023, 239-250. doi: 10.21608/aafu.2023.287480
HARVARD
Abbas Ghubin Al-Zubaidy, B. (2023). 'Application of Rhetorical Relations in the Analysis of Two English Romantic Sonnets', Annals of the Faculty of Arts, Ain Shams University, 51(3), pp. 239-250. doi: 10.21608/aafu.2023.287480
VANCOUVER
Abbas Ghubin Al-Zubaidy, B. Application of Rhetorical Relations in the Analysis of Two English Romantic Sonnets. Annals of the Faculty of Arts, Ain Shams University, 2023; 51(3): 239-250. doi: 10.21608/aafu.2023.287480