The comparative approach and its impact on the development of jurisprudence research and knowledge communication

The science of difference and comparative jurisprudence is the sound scientific method in order to find out the different opinions of the Jurists and being acquainted with the doctrines of scholars and their inferences on the rulings of the Sharia, leading to choosing what is closer to the purpose of the Sharia and the research in comparative jurisprudence studies deal with rulings, opinions, and evidence of issues of Islamic jurisprudence by scholars and imams of jurisprudence in Islamic schools of thought it has its importance and impact on the development of jurisprudential research and cognitive communication, and on the unity and rapprochement between these schools of thought, and the impact of comparative jurisprudence in leaving the circle of sectarian fanaticism and negative tradition, and it opens the door to the expansion of the circle of jurisprudential knowledge

Therefore, this research deals with explaining the concept of the comparative approach in the jurisprudential research And its importance, benefits, and impact of this approach in knowing the jurisprudential difference and employing it in a way that contributes to the development of jurisprudential research and in cognitive communication and rapprochement between sects.