نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية
المؤلف
أستاذ مساعد بکلية اللغات التطبيقية، بالجامعة الأهلية الفرنسية في مصر
المستخلص
الكلمات الرئيسية
الموضوعات الرئيسية
عنوان المقالة [English]
المؤلف [English]
The grammarians have considered the use of the apparent noun - as a connector - to be weak in speech, and that it was not in every place or in any case, and they have described it as it has taken the place of Pronoun. They have mentioned that the origin in such sentences was to express with pronoun, but the apparent noun is used of his place.
The interpreters of the Quran have built the possibility of interpretation - in many places - that the origin is the existence of pronoun, and that the apparent noun has taken its place when it is a connector or when it isn't, describing that as an exit on the origin, and then they have described the different semantic purposes for which the apparent noun mentioned in the place of pronoun.
This research attempts to prove that the pronominalization, ie, transformation to pronoun during the derivation from a deep structure to a surface structure, is not applied to the derivation history, but what occurs is stopping pronominalization as a result of the missing (accurate agreement) condition between the two nominal phrases in the deep structure, Which is the necessary condition for the application of the pronominalizaton transformation. Or for semantic purposes that the research has derived from it so-called rules of semantic interpretation.
The most important results are: that the missing of (accurate agreement) condition occurs when the lexical agreement between the nominal compounds in the deep structure is missed or when the referential agreement between them is missed. There are four cases where the second nominal phrase doesn't lexically agree with the first nominal phrase in the Qur'anic text, The cases are when the second nominal phrase is interpret with the first. and when the second nominal phrase is more specific than the first or more general than the first, or when the second nominal phrase is part of the first nominal phrase. One of the results is that the rules of semantic interpretation that required to stop pronominalization are: maximization, amplification, delusion and disamnigutiy, intention to insult, pejorative, notice of reason, intention of specific, exaggeration, increasing the clarification and the statement.
الكلمات الرئيسية [English]
)
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO