p. 1−29
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 30−73
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 74−105
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 106−145
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 146−188
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 189−198
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 199−217
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 218−227
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 228−249
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 250−264
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 265−284
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 285−301
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 302−327
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 328−348
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 349−375
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
(1952) in particular. The Mousetrap < /em>, which has broken records by becoming the longest running play in the history of London's West End since its debut in 1952, established Christie (the novelist, short story writer, and poet) as a playwright in the public eye. Stoppard's Hound, an absurdist two-act farce drawing upon the play-within-the-play conventions familiar to audiences of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, shows how Stoppard's work is exaggerating the style and content, and playing especially on the original. The paper has reached two findings. First, Stoppard parodies the predictability and hackneyed mechanism of the English whodunnit represented by Christie's The Mousetrap < /em>, as one of the most celebrated whodunnits in English literature, by means of his exceptional technique of the play-within-the-play parody. Second, by implication, the same author parodies theatre critics' jealousies, subjective judgments, and pompous pronouncements by means of the text-to-critic parody through the same technique of the play-within-the-play.]]>
p. 376−396
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)
p. 397−425
1110-7596
Vol.45/No.أکتوبر - دیسمبر (ب)